The Six-Part GTM Audit Checklist
A practical, six-part checklist for auditing ICP, positioning, targeting, messaging, infrastructure and execution before scaling outbound spend.
Most GTM audits start in the wrong place: messaging or channel mix, because those are the most visible and the easiest to change. By the time a symptom is visible in reply rates, the actual cause is often two or three layers upstream. This checklist works through a GTM motion in the order that prevents solving the wrong problem first — the same six-stage sequence used in every GTM Diagnostic. Each section below has the checklist item plus what “failing” that item actually looks like in a pipeline.
1. ICP
- Documented ICP tested against 12 months of closed-won/closed-lost deal history
- Operational and budget-readiness signals identified, not just firmographics
- Accounts tiered by fit and readiness, not treated as a single flat list
What failing looks like: a large share of closed-lost deals share the same “on paper” firmographics as your closed-won deals — meaning the ICP filter isn’t actually distinguishing buyers from non-buyers. See the ICP Definition Framework for a worked method to fix this.
2. Positioning
- Positioning statement tested: could a competitor’s name replace ours without anyone noticing?
- Value proposition tied to a specific, provable outcome rather than a general claim
What failing looks like: prospects open and read your emails but reply with polite indifference rather than objections. Indifference is usually a positioning problem wearing a targeting problem’s clothes.
3. Targeting
- Outbound targeting cross-checked against the current (possibly revised) ICP
- Roles and buying-moment timing reviewed, not just company-level fit
What failing looks like: the account list looks right at a glance (correct industry, correct size band) but the roles being contacted don’t match who actually champions this purchase, or accounts are contacted at a point in their business cycle with no active trigger.
4. Messaging
- Messaging performance segmented by variant, not just aggregate open/reply rates
- Messages tested for specificity, not just personalization
What failing looks like: reply rates look acceptable in aggregate but hide a wide spread between your best and worst-performing variants, so the aggregate number is quietly masking a real problem in most of the copy being sent.
5. Infrastructure
- Deliverability and domain reputation reviewed independently of messaging performance
- Data quality and enrichment sources checked for staleness
What failing looks like: strategy and messaging both check out, but open rates are structurally low across every campaign — a sign the emails aren’t reliably reaching the inbox in the first place, not that no one wants to read them.
6. Execution
- Cadence and follow-up discipline reviewed against documented process
- Qualification criteria confirmed consistent across the team
What failing looks like: two reps working comparable territories produce meaningfully different qualified pipeline from similar activity volume — usually a sign that “qualified” means something different depending on who’s doing the qualifying.
How to use this checklist
Work top to bottom, not bottom to top. Each layer can mask or mimic a problem in the layer below it — weak messaging can look like a targeting problem, and infrastructure issues can look like a positioning problem — which is why sequencing the audit matters as much as running it. If you check every box in one section before moving to the next, you avoid the most common failure mode: rewriting messaging for months to fix a problem that was actually sitting in the ICP.
Related reading
Start with a GTM Diagnostic.
60 minutes. One clear diagnosis. A practical next-step plan.